https://www.reuters.com/resizer/v2/CKO4QPNB6VOO3P26MODK3ITVQQ.jpg?auth=da4cf1f8fc8133658ff3d08cc029f257171f49d87f24b05193ca0fe68e16434e&height=628&width=1200&quality=80&smart=true

Trump outlines what new tariffs could entail

At the end of January 2025, the U.S. government revealed its intentions to impose tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals, steel, and computer chips. This action seeks to strengthen local manufacturing and tackle trade imbalances. Yet, these steps might profoundly impact global trade relations, especially influencing major U.S. partners in Asia.

In late January 2025, the U.S. administration announced plans to implement tariffs on imported computer chips, pharmaceuticals, and steel. This initiative aims to bolster domestic manufacturing and address trade imbalances. However, such measures could have significant implications for international trade dynamics, particularly affecting key U.S. allies in Asia.

The semiconductor industry is set to be notably impacted by these planned tariffs. Asia leads in worldwide chip production, producing over 80% of the planet’s semiconductors. Prominent firms such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSMC) and South Korea’s Samsung Electronics along with SK Hynix are key suppliers to the American market. For example, TSMC, recognized as the largest contract chip manufacturer internationally, earns about 70% of its revenue from North American customers, including tech powerhouses like Nvidia and Apple. Although TSMC is investing in a $65 billion production facility in Arizona, most of its output still occurs in Taiwan, which exposes it to the proposed tariffs. In a similar vein, Samsung and SK Hynix, which together hold around 75% of the global DRAM market, might encounter obstacles due to their significant exports to the United States.

Issues in the Pharmaceutical Industry

The pharmaceutical industry is also a key target of the proposed tariffs. Japanese pharmaceutical enterprises, such as Takeda, Astellas, Daiichi Sankyo, and Eisai, hold considerable interests in the U.S. market. For instance, Takeda noted that more than half of its revenue in the previous fiscal year was generated from the U.S., whereas Astellas mentioned that 41% of its earnings were derived from the U.S. market. Tariffs on imported pharmaceuticals might disrupt their operations and financial outcomes, potentially resulting in higher costs for U.S. consumers.

Steel Sector and Wider Economic Effects

Applying tariffs on steel imports aims to boost local steel manufacturing. Nevertheless, these actions may cause higher expenses for industries dependent on steel, like the automotive and construction sectors. Increased input costs could lead to higher prices for consumers and possible disruptions in supply chains. Additionally, these tariffs might strain relationships with principal trading partners and trigger retaliatory actions, further complicating global trade relations.

International Trade Relationships and Possible Retaliation

The suggested tariffs have raised worries among U.S. allies in Asia. Nations such as Taiwan, South Korea, and Japan, crucial to the worldwide supply chains of semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, could face economic difficulties due to diminished competitiveness in the American market. These countries might look to negotiate exemptions or contemplate retaliatory tariffs on U.S. exports, possibly initiating a cycle of trade conflicts.

National Economic Factors

Domestic Economic Considerations

While the tariffs aim to promote domestic manufacturing, they could have mixed effects on the U.S. economy. Importers are likely to pass increased costs onto consumers, leading to higher prices for goods such as electronics and medications. Additionally, industries dependent on imported components may face challenges in sourcing materials, potentially hindering production and innovation. Economists caution that such protectionist measures could disrupt supply chains and may not yield the intended benefits of job creation in the targeted industries.